Gerald, as I was browsing some of these statements, I came across this bit by you.

My own cognitive evolution has detoured through the communication medium of frequency patterns and rhythms, connecting it up to fractals, holons, and octaves as discovered throughout cultural paradigms in geometry, and, more recently, in Information Theory. It strikes me that this is a form of symbol-based Language development that is more inclusive than linguistic-based Languages, avoids the gender and cultural biases of concern to Lynne, Starr*, Bruce, and, no doubt, all of us.

There is most certainly an ancient tradition of linkage between metric Language, Taoism, Trinitarian traditions/paradigms, religion, science, digitally-based intelligence, genetic and atomic/molecular structure, transcending our Species.

Your link between rhythms and frequencies and language is interesting, and maybe very interesting, and maybe explosively powerful -- but for me, it's also hard to understand -- and whenever I read your comments, I always come up with the same thought. This guy is brilliant, but he needs an editor. :) !

I think the issue is -- you are taking on a huge chunk of speculative theory, and you are seeing connections in your own abstract thinking -- but there are so many connections, and they are so abstract -- it's hard to get them all in one place, in a stable, clear, linearly/sequentially unfolding way. But, if this turns out to be impossible to do -- there is a risk that you will be the only guy in the world who knows what you are talking about.

You could take this one tiny posting that you put here, just two short paragraphs -- don't talk about anything else -- and try to clarify the points it makes. Write an essay based on this alone. One point at a time -- take your time, be pedantic, but be clear. Be patient. Build a pathway other people can walk. Reach out to your reader -- figure out what they are thinking, what they can understand -- and from that starting point -- lead them one solid step at a time to the conclusions you are exploring....

For me, just start with one tiny clue.

WHAT do frequency patterns or fractal have to do with language? Slow down, take your time, and explain that one point. Otherwise, I am clueless and lost -- and it's very hard for me to read the next sentence. I just don't know what you are talking about, and I instantly feel like I am lost in the semantic quicksand of undefined abstraction.

Don't make huge leaps. Take small steps. Maybe that's too boring -- and I understand, I know how that feels -- but otherwise -- your theoretical map risks being totally incomprehensible to mere rational beings lost in linear duality, who have cross streets safely and wash the dishes at night...

Be a bridgebuilder -- from where we are to where you think we should/could be -- a bridge that gives us some safe footing and a solid path to the new understanding....